Monday, November 30, 2009

Speech of the Week #40: The Gary Busey Edition

Welcome everyone to a weekly column here on YDKS Movies entitled Speech of the Week! Every week, I will post a new scene from a movie that features a speech of some sort being given. After all, there are a lot of famous scenes in film where characters give an influential speech of some sort. Then again, there are also a lot of scenes where characters give a speech and it just comes off cheesy and lame. In this section, you will see both kinds. That's right, people, I'm giving you the good and bad of film speeches all wrapped up in one great big package. I hope you all enjoy.

This week's Speech of the Week is a little different than most speeches one will find here on YDKS. This week's speech doesn't actually come from a movie. Instead, it is an interview about a movie. The movie in question is Quigley, a 2003 low-budget Christian film about a rich a-hole (Gary Busey) who gets reincarnated as a white Pomeranian named Quigley in order to right all of his previous wrongs. If that plot synopsis doesn't sell you on the film, I don't know what will.

I didn't even realize this film existed until earlier tonight when my friend and former co-writer Zach Osborn told me about it. He's actually seen the movie and says it's just as awfully wonderful as you would imagine (in fact, he may be doing a guest writing spot here on YDKS to not only review the film but tell his pretty epic story about the role Quigley has played in his life). 

The interview below is of Gary Busey explaining the movie and how amazing it is. This is one of the most disturbing and hilarious interviews that I have ever seen. Let's just say there are times when Busey talks about how he received certain "information" from the other side during a near-death experience. He also talks about how God gave him cancer in his face all the while speaking with a pirate accent. 

It's just so bizarre that you have to watch it for yourself. Enjoy it below. 

Saturday, November 28, 2009

A Review of Twilight


First off, sorry for my absence over the past few weeks. I've been working hard on getting my GRE score up in order to get into film school. That and I've had other school and personal related things going on to keep me away. So I apologize. I should have more free time in the coming weeks (especially when Christmas break starts up).


Secondly, I bet you never expected to see a review for Twilight on here, did you?

Twilight has been one of those things that I've always enjoyed tearing apart here on YDKS Movies. The appeal for the series has always really alluded me and I didn't understand the crazy enthusiasm from these teenage girls for movies that had some of the worst trailers I've ever seen. Still, the fact remained that I had never seen the movie. With all the ripping I do on the series, it did kind of seem a little unfair that I haven't actually seen the movie I had been tearing apart. Also, with the movie looking as bad as it did, I found myself morbidly curious to just how awful it could be. According to my sister Avery, who was a fan of the books, the movie was beyond terrible. I knew I had to be in for a treat.

The night I got out for Thanksgiving break, I borrowed my sister's copy of the movie (which I don't understand why she owns it if she hates it...), snuggled up underneath my warm bed sheets and prepared myself for two hours of pure, MTV-style, teeny bopper garbage.

In a way, I got what I wanted. Twilight is a really bad movie. However, I have to say I was a little disappointed in my film viewing experience. The fact is, the movie wasn't absolutely unwatchable like I thought it would be.

Surprisingly, there are some things that Twilight has going for it. I felt that a lot of the first half of the movie with Bella getting adjusted to a new life in Washington worked for the most part. Sure, the situation has been done before but Catherine Hardwicke's handheld direction style really helped make it grounded and slightly interesting. Of course, this all goes downhill once the Cullens are introduced... but we'll get to that later...

Another thing that I felt worked well was the relationship between Bella and her father. For me, this was the most interesting part of the movie. I really like how actor Billy Burke portrayed Charlie. He made the scenes with him and Kristen Stewart a lot more interesting than they probably were on the page. The scene where Bella runs away and has to tear him down before doing so was particularly effective. I only wish I could care about the love story more than this father daughter subplot.

As far as the love story goes, I found the build to it interesting. The first encounter between Bella and Edward is really awkward and driven by a misunderstanding. In a sense, it feels like a lot of high school encounters that one can go through. That's when I felt that the relationship was working. It was when Hardwicke really latched onto the angsty and awkwardness that comes with puberty and going through a relationship, especially with someone who is very different. Unfortunately, once Edward finally admits that he's a vampire and he and Bella start follicking through the woods, things go really downhill. But I have to admit, I enjoyed the build to this at times.

While a lot of people really harped on Robert Pattinson's performance in the film, I think he did his best with the material he was given. Stephanie Meyer, from what I got from the screenplay based on her novel, isn't the best writer in town. Her dialogue is cliche and can be beyond awful at times. So, considering Pattinson had to deliver lines like "And so the lion fell in love with the lamb...," I felt he did the best he could with the situation. I did feel he brought some stand out moments to the screen as Edward at times. The fact that he just seems to freaking hate himself for being a vampire really made him kind of interesting to me. There were some nice moments of angst he had, especially in the car ride after saving Bella from some potential rapists. Unfortunately, Meyer's bad writing and terrible special effects really keep him from shining too much.

And now for the bad. First off, this movie has some of the worst special effects I have ever seen. Considering the book series is such a massive best seller, you would think that they would have a bigger budget for the film series. The effects look hokey beyond belief. Every time I would start to get into the film, a terrible effects sequence would start up and I would be out again. I really cannot stress how bad the effects are. They really are up to par with those exhibited in a SyFy Channel original movie. Yes, it's that bad. Unfortunately, director Hardwicke does not really seem to know how to film action sequences very well either. This only makes the bad effects stand out more and makes them more laughable.

The romance between Edward and Bella was really off and on for me. While the build was solid for the most part, the moment they become a couple in the woods I tuned out. The reason behind this is because it really just starts to feel like a written relationship. Everything that happens between Edward and Bella doesn't feel natural. It almost feels like what Hardwicke believes what would happen in a relationship between teenagers. Once I got to the scene where Edward and Bella just lay on the ground, staring longingly into each others' eyes for like five minutes, I couldn't stand it. 

Still, the relationship has its moments. The kiss between them in Bella's bedroom was really effective and their moment after the fight with James was pretty engaging as well. 

One of the biggest problems I had with the relationship is the fact that I didn't like Bella very much. Many people give Kristen Stewart flack for this but, to be honest, I think I have to go back to Meyer's writing. Bella as a character just isn't interesting. There's really nothing going on with her. She's the new girl. That's it. That's all that she has going on. In the end, she's just too damn boring and flaky to really care about. Because of this, it was harder for me to get into the relationship between her and Edward.

Hardwicke's portrayal of vampires in Twilight is mostly laughable. The scene where the Cullens are introduced in the cafeteria had me rolling my eyes. The fact that they look so pale and ridiculous really took me out the movie a lot of the time. How could no one know that there's something wrong with them? No one looks that pale and dresses so damn weird in real life. With all the realism that had been established so far, their introduction just felt cheesy. The way the evil vampires are portrayed is even worse. They are always shot in slow motion from a low angle when they enter a scene. They all dress in a beyond ridiculous fashion. They just sit out like a sore thumb. It's just silly.

Still, out of all of these complaints, nothing measures up to the infamous vampire baseball scene. Yes, that's right: vampires play baseball in this movie. I'm not sure why but Hardwicke devotes a whole five minutes to it. It's cut awkwardly to a Muse song, has shots randomly cutting between fast and slow motion and shows off the movie's terrible special effects more than it should. This scene is just so out of nowhere and terrible. It's just beyond silly. I still don't understand it.

In the end, Twilight wasn't the worst movie I've seen. It has some decent moments here and there. I felt that Pattinson made the character of Edward more interesting than he was on paper but that the text and terrible effects really held him back. I also felt that the subplot between Bella and her dad was pretty effective. Unfortunately, Meyer's terrible writing, beyond awful special effects and off-and-on direction from Hardwicke really stop the movie from ever becoming good or remotely original. Twilight ends up being your typical teenage movie with a vampire covering thrown in to make it appear like it's unique in some way. However, it's terribly cliche, often too silly to ever invest in and terribly mediocre. I honestly can't remember one scene that really made me ever want to see the movie again and that's not a good thing. It's not unwatchable but it's truly forgettable at the same time.

3/10

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Kick-Ass Teaser Trailer Released


The teaser trailer for Matthew Vaughn's film adaptation of Mark Millar's comic book Kick-Ass was released yesterday. This movie has been racking up some serious buzz since footage premiered at Comic-Con this past summer. Apparently, test screenings have been held since then and the reviews have been nothing but glowing. And I'm talking "this is the best comic book movie ever made" kind of glowing.


The basic premise is that a normal kid decides to become a superhero. He puts on a costume and goes out to fight crime. Of course, he has no super powers and, because of this, he often gets the crap kicked out of him. His appearance spawns multiple copycats and he is hunted by an assortment of violent characters.

Since the teaser trailer is a green band, I am told that it doesn't really give a sense of how this movie really is. With that said, it's still enjoyable. The opening of the trailer is really clever and quite beautiful to watch. However, I don't think I'm digging the use of "Bad Reputation" by Joan Jett and the Blackhearts over the last half of the trailer. 

Anyways, I'm still excited about seeing this movie. Watch the teaser trailer below.



Source: Trailer Addict

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Watch Bobby Loves Mangos

I saw Bobby Loves Mangos a few months ago when /Film hosted it as a Video of the Day. Since watching it back then, I have been meaning to do an article on it. However, things ended up coming up and I forgot about it. That is, until now.


In the late 1990's, director Stuart Archer made this short and began getting it into various film festivals. However, the film didn't really pick up until he infamously tricked Robert Ebert into watching the film (a story that is told before the film starts in the YouTube version below). Ebert ended up loving the movie and endorsed it.

The plot for Bobby Loves Mangos is very simple but still very intriguing. An elementary school principal receives a videotape in the mail from the future that warns him of a school bus accident that will kill fifty children. The story deals with a lot of moral decisions and what happens when you try to change the future. Also, the ending is surprising and not exactly where I thought the movie would go.

Watch the whole short film below in three parts. It's pretty low budget but the story and direction are so strong it's pretty much impossible not to get sucked in. 







Source: /Film

Monday, November 2, 2009

Near Dark Goes Twilight

While Monster Fest has come to an end here on YDKS Movies, I do have one more horror movie related item to talk about here.


In 1987, director Kathryn Bigelow made a flawed but underrated vampire film called Near Dark. The film managed to be an odd but refreshing mix of a classic vampire film and a western drama. In the movie, the word "vampire" is never ever dropped. The vampires do not have fangs. The only thing that makes them vampires is the fact that they must feed off of human blood and must stay out of sunlight.

The film showcases a pretty impressive cast with the likes of Lance Henriksen, Bill Paxton and Jenette Goldstein (all fresh off of James Cameron's Aliens). The movie features some very tense scenes (the infamous bar room massacre and the motel escape attempt being stand outs) and even has some impressive symbolism (with vampirism working as parallel for drug addiction). Still, the movie is pretty dated and does drag in places. Also, it's ending never really fit well for me personally.

Despite these flaws, Near Dark is a respectable entry into the vampire genre of film. It's not great but it's pretty good. And it certainly doesn't need to be compared to crap like Twilight.

Unfortunately, that's what seems to be happening. On November 1oth, a Blu-ray version of the movie is being released with the cover at the top of this article. The cover blatantly tries to go for a Twilight look. It makes Caleb all white and pale, giving him the look of Edward while turning Mae into the damsel that Bella always seems to be on advertisements.

The thing is, that doesn't even make sense with the Near Dark plot. Mae is the vampire that turns Caleb. Caleb spends most of the movie sick and struggling with vampirism. He doesn't even really become a strong hero figure until the end. Mae is the one who has to be the strong one through most of the movie. Also, none of them are pale in the movie. Sure, Caleb's pretty white when he's sick at one point but they never look all Edward Cullen pale. 

Just look at the Anchor Bay Special Edition DVD cover above that was released a few years back. That's what the cover of Near Dark should look like. It captures the retro 1980's feel of the movie while also getting the ominous feeling of it across as well. It just feels right. The new cover doesn't feel right at all. It just feels like a cheap cash in on a shameful but lucrative franchise. 

I know some may not see a need for this article but I do. I just really don't like it when movies try to cash in on the success of other films... especially when those other films are terrible ones that just happen to be successful due to an idiotic fan base. The fact is, this new cover will probably sell more copies of Near Dark. I just wish it didn't. 

The fact is, Near Dark, despite its flaws, deserves better.