After their brutal, pessimistic and incredibly well-crafted adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men, directors Joel and Ethan Coen take a well deserved breather and deliver one of the silliest, over-the-top, vulgar and hilarious films I’ve seen in quite awhile with Burn After Reading. The few people that were introduced to the brother directing team via their Oscar winning effort of No Country of Old Men will probably be sorely disappointed with this film. It’s nonsensical at times, idiosyncratic, bumbling, slapstick and more in the vein of previous Coen efforts such as The Big Lebowski and Fargo. However, just as one begins to get comfortable with ungainly characters and bizarre situations, the Coen Brothers blind side the audience with tension, suspense and incredibly graphic violence reminiscent of their previous Oscar winning film. In other words, this film is a guaranteed good time.
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Wesley's Burn After Reading Review
Posted by
Wesley
at
1:29 AM
Basically, what I’m trying to say is that, if you were potty trained at birth and were taught how to keep food in your mouth while chewing, you should be fine while taking this film in.
Now, back to the quality of the film at hand.
Burn After Reading deals with interconnecting stories between a vast amount of quirky characters from a recently fired CIA officer to his cold, cheating wife to small time gym employees to an exercise-obsessed womanizer to many more. When a disc of Osborne Cox’s (John Malkovich) memoirs of working at the CIA land in the hands of dim witted personal trainer Chad (Brad Pitt) and insecure gym employee Linda (Frances McDormand), they decide to be “good Samaritans” and black mail the former CIA officer for cash. Soon, everyone from spies for divorce lawyers to the CIA themselves become involved and bodies start to pile up.
The strongest appeal of Burning After Reading lies in the quirky characters that Joel and Ethan Coen have created and the amazingly talented cast that inhabits them. With a cast full of people such as Brad Pitt, George Clooney, John Malkovich, Tilda Swindon, Frances McDormand, and J.K. Simmons, you should know that you are getting something special. Each cast member gives a unique performance that is strong in its own way but Brad Pitt completely steals the show as moron personal trainer Chad. His hyper active and somewhat child-like persona is incredibly fun to watch and seemed to engage the audience every time he came on screen. Pitt particularly stood out in the phone call scene to Malkovich’s character and during his first contact with that character. I really just loved everything about his character, from the absurd highlights in his hair to the iPod that he had attached to his bicep. It was just such an entertaining character to watch deal with such a serious (and dangerous) situation.
The Coen Brothers themselves are another big appeal of the film. Fresh off their Oscar winning run with No Country for Old Men, the brothers change up their seemingly meditative style from that film to one of more flair and energy (something that matches this film quite well). From the opening computer generated zoom-in to the CIA building in Washington, D.C. from space, one can already tell how vastly different the Coens’ approach will be in this film as compared to their last effort. Their direction is incredibly slick, well framed, and very expertly and comically timed. They are able make scenes with their shambling characters awkward and funny in one moment while making another scene incredible tense and nerve-racking at the drop of a hat (especially the closet scene). Through these ranges, they are able to make an insane film that is just amazingly fun to watch unfold.
Despite that fact that it is a very well made film with very talented people behind it, Burn After Reading is not a film for everyone. If you are not familiar to the Coens’ sense of strange, odd-ball, crude, and often violent sense of humor, then you will probably not be into this film. The mixture of graphic violence with their peculiar comedy seemed to turn off and downright confuse a lot of people in the audience while the rest of us who were in on the joke got a kick out of what the Coens were trying to do. It is also important to note that Burn After Reading is not the Coens' best film. While it is very funny and crafted, it does take a while to really get going (though the opening scene in the CIA office is hilariously brilliant) and, despite being only 96 minutes, feels a little long towards the end. Don’t get me wrong- I loved the movie and honestly thought it put films like Tropic Thunder to shame in the humor department but, after some thought, it doesn’t really hold a candle to some of the Coens' previous efforts such as Fargo, The Big Lebowski, etc. However, if you’re into the Coen Brothers and comedies with bizarre characters, over-the-top insanity, and a lot of vulgarity, then Burn After Reading should be a fun time for you.
7/10
7 comments:
Way to sound like a little Coen fanboy. There is nothing so special about the Coens, that certain people get it and some don't, despite what Coen lovers would have everyone other than themselves think. The reason people don't like this film is because it wasn't that good to begin with. You don't have to be "in on the joke" or "know the Coens" to realize that this film isn't particularly great. The boredom abounds, and while I saw it with a good audience, the laughs dwindled as time went by. Just like when you watch the same thing over and over, and while you still think its funny, its just not worth it to laugh anymore. The over-the-top violence took no one by surprise and that effect has been done so many times now, it is practically cliche. The jokes in this movie are hit and miss just like the Coens track record.
It sounds like I hated it. I didn't hate it, and I agree that the acting was superb all around. Especially Brad Pitt. But this movie wasn't special or spectacular. It just felt rushed, and uninspired more often than not.
Tropic Thunder is the superior comedy of this year.
I have to disagree with that comment, Jason. I really don't think that it felt "uninspired" at all. I get the feeling that the Coens knew exactly what they were doing when they made this film - spectacular wasn't what they were going for. I laughed consistently throughout, and I got pretty immersed in the story as well. I feel like the Coens did a great job with crafting an intricate spy plot that managed to be light-hearted and quite hilarious at times. I agree that it wasn't one of the Coens' best efforts, but I love comedies so much and this one did not disappoint at all.
This was a better movie than Tropic Thunder. But best comedy of the year is still Forgetting Sarah Marshall.
Jason, I disagree with everything you said. Just so you know.
Oh and Tropic Thunder wasn't that funny. Really. This was a thousand times better. And yes, Zach, Forgetting Sarah Marshall is the best comedy of this year.
*Spoilers* I waited until this morning to sleep on it and decide how I really feel about the movie, because I really want to give it a fair chance. But I'm gonna hafta pick a medium between the two of your comments, probably leaning towards Jason's take on it. I really did think it was funny at times and had its moments, but overall I really felt uncomfortable with the whole thing. I mean, how many times do we really need to laugh at Malkovich's use of the F-word? I will say one thing... Brad Pitt was superb. Good performance all around, even down to that facial expression he had right before he got capped was priceless. But back to the point at hand... I leaned over to Amy half-way thru it and tried to convey just how confused and uncomfortable I was with the whole movie. I just felt bored for nearly an hour straight. Not one of my favorite comedies, but I would probably give it another chance down the road. 4/10 if you ask me.
Wesley, I figured you would disagree seeing as how I didn't agree with your review much in the first place. But that's cool.
Blossom, I also slept on it, and still felt the same way about the movie afterwards. I would say a 4/10 is a good score. It definitely was uncomfortable, especially when we are watching a movie about completely selfish people using nothing but four letter words. In summary, I am starting to feel that the word "pointless" is a more appropriate description than "over-the-top."
Well, I did not find it uncomfortable at all- I just really enjoyed it.
Also, no one can deliver a solid F-bomb like John Malkovich.
Yes, but upwards of 20 or 30 times? Maybe in moderation its funny a little, but when he says it 7 times in a single scene, it just gets irritating. And thanks for agreeing with me, Jason. I still stand by my rating, despite being ridiculed by the other guys I saw the movie with. Never back down.
Post a Comment